To: dirtboy
"Gawd, is it IMPOSSIBLE for you to stay on topic?"
Why don't ya tell that to yourself? You keep jumping all ver the place.
"The subject is the claim that Rudy could put PA in play. "
Nope.
The subject is the fact that Rudy is not only ahead n the red states, he is running neck and neck with The great Satan Hitekry in the Blue states as well. Go back to the start of this thread and read again will ya?
"You're either dense or obtuse on purpose here"
You are both obtuse and are a 5th columnist and an agent of Hitelry.
"Once again, please show how Rudy could atract pro-life PA Dems"
# 1. That is not the topic of this thread.
# 2. I don't have to show that seeing that rick Santoram was as pro-life as they come, and still lost.
To: ShawTaylor
The subject is the fact that Rudy is not only ahead n the red states, he is running neck and neck with The great Satan Hitekry in the Blue states as well. Go back to the start of this thread and read again will ya?And a key issue there is pro-life Dem swing voters. Try to keep up.
64 posted on
02/22/2007 8:08:59 AM PST by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08)
To: ShawTaylor; Jim Robinson
You are both obtuse and are a 5th columnist and an agent of Hitelry.That nonsense doesn't work here, dude. I was out protesting the Clintons long before you showed up on FR. So was the owner of this website, and he's against Rudy. Wanna call him an agent of Hillary as well?
67 posted on
02/22/2007 8:10:44 AM PST by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08)
To: ShawTaylor
I've been following this thread and the last few messages between between you and dirtboy.
He's right. You keep wandering from the point that was raised.
You jumped into the thread when dirtboy raised the point to MittFan08 that Rudy G. would have a hard time flipping pro-life and pro-gun Pennsylvania Democrats and Indies over to the Republican side. Instead of addressing his point, you went off on a tangent that had very little to do how Rudy G. could attract conservative Dems and Indies.
Sorry to confront you like this, but it seems like this argument needs a third opinion to break the tie.
676 posted on
02/24/2007 8:22:50 PM PST by
jackie johnson
(Never Expect Power Always)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson