You are now being absurd. Candidates can be in favor of a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage and not be looking to put gays in prison. You are now debating dishonestly without stupid hyperbole - unless that's all you've got.
The post was in response to a specific premise raised in the post I was responding to: that those of us who oppose St. Rudy do so based soley on his position on abortion. That premise is false.
As for Hillary, I have no business, nor interest, in who the Democrat nominee is. I'm not a Democrat. Not a Republican, either. I'm an independent conservative.
And there's a great deal of difference in not being anti-gay, and being pro-gay. For example, Rudy's diktat, as Mayor, guaranteeing full benefits for same sex partners of city employees [at the expense of city taxpayers]. Showed his concern, like when he directed city agencies NOT to cooperate with the INS looking for illegals, or when he gave the PD the green light to revoke legitimately held gun licenses. That one went hand in hand with his lawsuit [one of first] against gun manufacturers. Capice?