Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sandy
You, however, are claiming that the Constitution mandates that particular criminal laws must exist in every state. You're missing the whole point of federalism.

The main reason for having a Bill of Rights is to make sure that all Americans, no matter what state they live in, have their unalienable rights protected.

447 posted on 02/22/2007 5:27:58 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Rudy Giuliani is the answer; if the question is: "Who can most effectively destroy the GOP?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
The main reason for having a Bill of Rights is to make sure that all Americans, no matter what state they live in, have their unalienable rights protected.

No, that's not correct. The Bill of Rights was a restraint on the national government. It didn't restrain the states at all.

457 posted on 02/22/2007 5:54:52 PM PST by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson