Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spiff
Endorsement of the passage of the Human Life Amendment is in the Republican Party Platform and has been there for decades.

Why has it been there for decades with so little action on it? Why is there always all kinds of noise and lip service before elections, we're told it's vital everyone from the president to his cabinet be pro life... and we have elected all kinds of pro life candidates but nothing ever happens on it? I'm quite serious. We always hear what a vital issue a candidate's stand on abortion is... This time we're practically being bashed on the head with it... WHY?

Most candidates would rather die than talk about abortion, and once elected, they won't touch it with a ten foot pole. I think this is true on both sides. Even nominees to the supreme court... the guys we've been told are ones who might ever do anything to overturn abortion, must pretend they've never really thought about it and would only consider it if it's brought before them sometime. So I'm tired of it being the main source of noise and distraction during campaigns, when in reality, nothing ever happens on it anyway.

Abortion is a Red Herring. No one elected today will ever do a thing about it, Just like they haven't in the last decades they've claimed to care about it. We've had a pro-life president and a pro-life majority for most of the last 8, and there was only a little bit of actual action, and not much came of it. Oh - and we got two more guys appointed to the Supreme Court who were able to convince Congress that they hadn't made up their mind but *wink* *wink* *nod* *nod* "I'm with you". IMHO, the momentum to end abortion is more likely to come about because of advances in medicine, not because of anything weak, poll-watching elected leaders (and they all are) will ever do.

413 posted on 02/22/2007 4:09:50 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]


To: HairOfTheDog
President Bush is pro life and he talks and leads by example. Even gets things done, like bans on partial birth abortion, appointing "originalists," etc. Conversely, the direction a pro abortion person would lead us and the things he would get done are not acceptable.
422 posted on 02/22/2007 4:22:18 PM PST by Jim Robinson (It's "originalists" not "constructionists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson