Didn't these same folk vote for pro-choice candidates at other times?
I'm suggesting that these folks, while being pro-life, do not use pro-life as a litmus test. They *will* vote for pro-choice candidates. So your stating that Rudy loses all those votes no matter what is pure, unfounded speculation.
As seems to be suggested by their past voting patterns.
I see this takes some hand-holding for the average Rudy-booster.
If the GOP runs a pro-choice candidate and the Dems run a pro-choice candidate, there is no reason for a pro-life Dem to switch parties.
That should be obvious. It's scary that it isn't for so many Rudy boosters.