Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. urged to reassess claim against North Korea (ready to make further concession?)
Reuters ^ | 02/22/07 | Carol Giacomo

Posted on 02/22/2007 5:41:38 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

U.S. urged to reassess claim against North Korea

By Carol Giacomo, Diplomatic Correspondent

Wed Feb 21, 7:20 PM ET

The United States should reexamine a questionable charge that North Korea has a covert uranium enrichment program, a key American complaint against Pyongyang that could complicate the new nuclear weapons deal, experts said on Wednesday.

Physicist David Albright, who recently visited the isolated communist state, likened the enrichment program charge to the "fiasco" of flawed U.S. intelligence that mistakenly concluded Iraq had a secret nuclear weapons program in the runup to war.

The CIA in 2002 said North Korea began purchasing large quantities of centrifuge-related equipment in 2001 and was building a plant that could produce enough weapons-grade uranium for two or more nuclear weapons annually, perhaps by 2005.

Albright told a news conference "it may be another case of lack of evidence" because there has been no recent data to support the claim and the North may not have built the plant.

"It's long overdue for the United States to revisit that assessment," added Albright, head of the Institute for Science and International Security.

But a U.S. official told Reuters: "There's a strong body of evidence they had made an effort to develop an industrial-scale (enrichment) program. How far they've gotten -- we can debate that. How much we can prove -- that's another question."

Although U.S. officials said North Korea initially acknowledged the uranium program during a 2002 meeting, Pyongyang has since denied its existence.

Under a breakthrough deal last week, the North agreed to seal its main nuclear reactor and the source of its publicly acknowledged weapons-grade plutonium in return for an initial 50,000 tons of fuel or equivalent economic aid.

MAJOR CHALLENGE

The agreement requires North Korea to declare its nuclear activities. This will be a major challenge because, if the uranium enrichment program is not included, the deal could run aground, the U.S. official said.

Albright said that during recent talks in Pyongyang, senior North Korean officials continued to deny the enrichment program but told him and Asia expert Joel Wit they were willing to resolve the issue because it soured relations with Washington.

"We need clarity on the extent of the North Korean program. It cannot be swept under the rug," another U.S. official said.

At the news conference and in a new report, Albright said North Korea can make a nuclear warhead that can be mounted on missiles capable of hitting all of South Korea and most of Japan. He also said the impoverished state had separated enough plutonium for five to 12 nuclear weapons.

Many proliferation experts doubt North Korea has the ability to miniaturize a nuclear warhead to fit on a missile and Albright acknowledged many Asian governments disputed his findings.

But he said Pyongyang probably obtained technology from the nuclear black market of rogue Pakistani scientist A.Q. Khan and had been working for years to put a crude nuclear warhead on a Nodong missile.

Wit called the nuclear deal "a good step forward" but said "there is a serious risk of failure ... (that could lead to a) dangerous crisis" because the agreement is so complicated.

He urged the United States to lead the process going forward and work hard at improving diplomatic relations with Pyongyang because this will help smooth over the inevitable future rough patches.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: appeasement; heu; korea; reassessment
Some people are now advocating that we should forget about HEU program. Do not even have to verify if it does not exist.

This is a dangerous proposal. Boy, things are changing fast. I am sure that Iran, especially, its loose-cannon president, would be really pleased to see this development.

1 posted on 02/22/2007 5:41:43 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 02/22/2007 5:42:30 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

They admit that they do. What is this guy thinking?


3 posted on 02/22/2007 5:44:03 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Seems like Jong-Il has an easy time pulling the wool over the eyes of people named "Albright."


4 posted on 02/22/2007 5:45:17 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

" Physicist David Albright, "

Hmmmmm...

An interesting similarity in name with someone else intimately linked to the "Appease NK" movement...

Coincidence??


5 posted on 02/22/2007 5:46:12 AM PST by Uncle Ike (Aspiring Guru Seeks Disciples and Admiring Followers -- apply within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

korea will probably break the seal after they get the aid they ask for. It's happened before.


6 posted on 02/22/2007 5:46:16 AM PST by freebird5850
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Re #3

Apparently, he is another member of 'Sunshine club.' This is typical liberal MO. When reality is inconvenient, rehash it until it becomes to their liking.

7 posted on 02/22/2007 5:47:31 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

You got it !


8 posted on 02/22/2007 6:09:33 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Physicist David Albright, who recently visited the isolated communist state, likened the enrichment program charge to the "fiasco" of flawed U.S. intelligence

Stopped reading right there. WHy is this news? Some nobody runs over to NK, gets a guided tour and claims there is no clandestine enrichment program? When Lord, will we be rid of these useless idiots?!?
9 posted on 02/22/2007 7:34:06 AM PST by steel_resolve (They hate us because they do not rule us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If you are going to give the barn away, might as well throw in a few farming tools and the family car.


10 posted on 02/22/2007 3:19:17 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

IRAN's intransigence is DIRECTLY related to what they see the Bush Administration doing with North Korean (conciliatory concession one after another, and window dressing replies by the North in response).


11 posted on 02/22/2007 3:20:21 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

How is Japan reacting to all of this? What's their take? Thanks!


12 posted on 02/22/2007 3:52:49 PM PST by jwh_Denver ("Planet of the Apes" happened because people wouldn't proof read their posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jwh_Denver

As with most American efforts involving dealing with Asia (with the exception of WWII) with respect to our enemies we may have in that region and that culture, that once again The Americans were worn down by the very patient, shrewd, tricky and immensely stubborn North Koreans.


13 posted on 02/22/2007 8:30:44 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Since this article was posted, the CIA (according to the WSJ) has indicated in congressional testimony that it is now less sure of the previous findings concerning North Korean uranium production.


14 posted on 03/05/2007 4:48:39 PM PST by berserker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson