[xmission]

I'm so sick of this bin-laden charade.

Why don't we ask these A$$wipes this.

"Mr/Mrs _______, recently you've been trying to show that iraq is not important, and that Afghanistan is vitally important instead. You've repeatedly brought up the fact that osama bin laden has not been caught, and that this another area where the president has failed miserably.

In 1996 Eric Rudholf went on the run to avoid being arrested for a bombing in an abortion center. President Clinton had 4 years to track down a terrorist inside the united states. Surely this would be vastly more easy than tracking someone on the other side of the world.

What possible reason could President Clinton have for not apprehending Eric Rudolf during that 4 year period, and why is President Bush being held to a much higher standard?

I think Hillary would be a prime candidate for this question... Why isn't the MSM asking this?

[Robert A Cook PE]

And, in those four years when the FBI's chief domestic terrorism task force head (THE guy responsible for domestic terrorism!) was spending all his time chasing down Rudolph in the woods of North Carolina, that same task force FBI leader said that "right wing Christian churches" represented his primary terrorism concern in the years leading up to the Y2K turnover!

But later, Clinton claimed EVERY DAY he was pursuing OBL ..... Right.