Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reagan Man
Aw, c’mon, Team Republican says, nobody who purports to be socially conservative, evangelical, or who voted twice for Ronald Reagan will be able to muster a vote for Hillary over Rudy.

Probably right. But voting for her isn’t the only option. When the electorate isn’t excited about the candidates, they are capable of staying home — particularly those who don’t much care to think political thoughts 24/7 and are not enthused about the choices. There are others of us who will either leave the presidential portion of the ballot unmarked or decide for the first time in our lives to vote, say, the Constitution Party.

Only a moron would fail to notice that a non-vote for Rudy would redound to Hillary's benefit.

5 posted on 02/21/2007 12:13:09 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: snarks_when_bored
>>>>>Only a moron would fail to notice that a non-vote for Rudy would redound to Hillary's benefit.

If you're a conservative and you're considering voting for the liberal Rudy Giuliani or the liberal Hillary Clinton, you're a person without a conscience, principles and integrity.

16 posted on 02/21/2007 12:26:33 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: snarks_when_bored

Not only that, the Conservatives will NOT "stay home."

The Republicans lost in 2006, not because Conservatives "stayed home," but because "Undecideds" or "Independents" voted for Democrats.

If it gets to a choice between a Liberal like Rudy Giuliani and a Commie like Clinton, they will vote for Giuliani.


20 posted on 02/21/2007 12:28:16 PM PST by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson