What did I call him, exactly?
And you've clearly established your political agenda on this issue.
My agenda is to correct egregious errors of science, such as the one indicated above. As a conservative Republican, I am very concerned when other conservative Republicans post misleading and erroneous information on an issue with important societal implications. If that means I have a "political agenda", so be it.
Really? You could have fooled me.
Then start with those who choose to short circuit the process of reviewed science!
James Hansen, Heidi Cullen, Senator Collins, Senator Rockefeller have all made efforts to silence those who choose to even question anthropological global warming.
Bjorn Lonborg still believes in anthropological global warming, but is demonized because he believes that there are better ways to spend money on the environment.
Clearly this is not a scientific article, so please spare us from your self-important heroic "efforts." Nobody on the anti-GW side is suggesting that "its over", "end of discussion", "take away certification" or any other Stalinist notions that are designed to stop scientific discourse.