You can't figure out who wrote the articles from that information? C'mon.
I don't particularly enjoy wild goose chases, but I did go this extra step, which is as far as I'm going...
From this gem (from Gavin Schmidt): Is this clown serious?
"Like the recent movie "The Day After Tomorrow", the novel addresses real scientific issues and controversies, but is similarly selective (and occasionally mistaken) about the basic science."
That's all I need to know about this guy's judgement, never mind his bureaucratic "science". Computer modelling is "science"? Give me a break.
Anyone who would compare The Day After Tomorrow (I missed the bibliography on that one!) with State of Fear has got to have a screw loose. If nothing else, I would question his judgement.
The creators of "The Day After..." admitted that they made stuff up with no regard for science, but just for the drama a la Godzilla movies...
That absurd comparison speaks volumes about this guy's exaggerated opinion of himself.
Hardly the source for unbiased scientific validation about anything.