Skip to comments.
Rudolph Giuliani?
American Thinker ^
| February 21, 2007
| Selwyn Duke
Posted on 02/20/2007 10:24:10 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-145 last
To: GraceCoolidge
they believe he cannot possibly win the White HouseAnd if he does manage to slip through, well, it will not be too much different from a Democrat win, not even with personnel. I expect Mr. Giuliani to do some sort of "fusion" thing once in office.
141
posted on
02/21/2007 2:35:32 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
To: presently no screen name; All
You still haven't listed the accomplishments of Hillary and Obama. Instead I received lots of childish replies. You cannot back up what your call a 'valid' statement. Go play with someone else who has more time to baby-sit you.
I'll take that to mean that you have no idea where Nelson Rockefeller was 'involved in politics' outside of New York long before he died. Here are some easy clues for you: Nelson Rockefeller served as Governor of New York, spent money like it was water, always sought to raise taxes, he was an unabashed FDR-style 'New Dealer', and so far as political office, the only political office he served in after being Governor of New York, was the appointed Vice President of Gerald R. Ford. That's it, and that was enough. So if you have knowledge of some other mystery state Nelson was running outside of New York and the VP slot, by all means: enlighten us all.
Now if you are so focused on the 'accomplishments' of Hillary and Obama you could Google them yourself. My comparing your idol Rudy Guiliani with Hillary and Obama in the way of experience and accomplishments should have been crystal clear to anyone with a room temperature IQ; all three of those individuals do NOT have the experience to serve as President of the United States. To wit: Obama - first term junior Senator from Illinois with no experience or knowledge in national security OR executive experience. Hillary - barely into her second term as New York's junior Senator, her only claim to fame is being the First 'Lady' during the 2 terms of Emperor Billigula. Likewise, she has no national security experience except for what positions in the Senate she managed to maneuver herself into over the course of her first term, and so far into this second term. Rudy Guiliani - an appointed federal prosecutor, his only elective office is former Mayor of New York. And were it not for his high profile on 9/11, he would be laughed off the national stage for even suggesting that he is ready to serve as President of the United States.
You, my unnamed friend, are just one more RudyBot, and an ignorant one at that - you clamor for me to list the 'accomplishments' of the three abovementioned individuals, when you know as well as I do that those individuals have so much in common politically (inexperience, liberal and WAY left of center, not to mention their support for infanticide, gun control, homosexual marriage, need I go on?) that their 'accomplishments' are virtually interchangeable so far as their own world view, their own social positions, and how they would govern if God forbid any one of them ever made to the Oval Office as Chief Executive.
I don't have to 'back up' a valid statement to satisfy the likes of you when you don't even have a basic understanding of past and present political history and reality.
So go educate yourself, I'm sure RudyBot Central has remedial courses that will bring you more in line with their out-of-the-mainstream-left-liberal-positions.
You're wise to use 'presently no screen name' as a handle, because you probably won't be remembered that way and you might evade the residual embarrassment that goes with it.
We're done here Mr. RudyBot.
Have a nice evening.
142
posted on
02/21/2007 2:50:09 PM PST
by
mkjessup
(If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
To: dirtboy
Had to be part of their plan. After all they don't seem to care about the consequences.
To: neverdem
144
posted on
02/21/2007 8:46:57 PM PST
by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Explain it for those of us that didn't get it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-145 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson