[dirtboy]

No, they did not and the internals are very clear on that point. The Democrats want you to believe what you cherry picked from the 'exit polls' but it is hogwash.

Please back up your assertion, then. NR had a very compelling article to the contrary, so what have YOU got?

When it comes to a conservative Democrat who has some feelings for the right to choose or strong national defense, he will always choose national defense over choice.

Unless, of course, the drumbeat of the MSM over Iraq continues to erode support for the war. In the very demo Rudy would need to run into as a pro-war pubbie in order to make up votes lost from the GOP splintering.

It ain't happening. The Dem candidate will move rightwards far enough to keep the pro-security Dems on the rez, and Rudy won't be able to pull over pro-life and pro-gun Dems and Indies. Game over.

[harrowup]

It doesn't matter what position HRC has on the 'war'. It comes down to the fact that men are not going to be happy with a woman running the national defense and end up with another Falklands fiasco. No Democrat gives a hoot about choice v. CiC when the question is HRC. NR (I assume you mean National Review) has never figured out how the Democrats are smart enough to spend good money on 'issues' and 'feelings' which trump principles every time.

Conservative Democrats are practical folks just like their Republican counterparts.

Hillary knows she has a problem with them both just because she is a woman who happens to be a bitch.

Conservative Democrats on the other hand can't abide the evangelical right that you seem to represent. You can't have any of them...none.

Get over it...