[bcsco]

We're the "in crowd" in his office.

Thanks for spilling the agenda. You and the others here who have been so adamantly pro-Paul are actually staff workers. I thought there was something that was unusual about this thread, especially your refusal to answer direct questions. Now I know.

And thanks for telling me on behalf of Ron Paul (yes, I'm including Austin Willard Wright as one of your henchmen) that I, a voter, am not needed. I'm going to get that message out to the masses in spades. I guarantee that.

Actually, I'm glad to see that you and Wright are on staff. More like you and Paul's ship will be sunk in no time.

[MeanWestTexan]

"Thanks for spilling the agenda. You and the others here who have been so adamantly pro-Paul are actually staff workers."

Caught that, too.

Wonder if there is a campaign law violation, here?

Worth reporting, just because I don't like him.

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

Thanks for spilling the agenda. You and the others here who have been so adamantly pro-Paul are actually staff workers....Actually, I'm glad to see that you and Wright are on staff. More like you and Paul's ship will be sunk in no time.

Ron Paul does not office out of Oklahoma (where I live and work), and I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of his staff. I have never even lived in Texas.

My statement to "IronTank", who is a Calvinist like myself, referred to the fact that Calvinists are strongly represented in Ron Paul's office.

Here, I'll try to make it more clear to you: "We, Calvinists, are the 'in-crowd' in his office." Does that make it clearer?

[capt. norm]

Good grief, if Ron Paul hired the likes of these two (members of his office 'in crowd') to work for his campaign....it's already doomed.

You don't make points here by using liberal language and tactics.