Because of his association with Norquist. But why are you so affirmatively convinced he can be?
Now you have not addressed two things that I asked: You have not addressed post #32 and you have not addressed the specifics of my question about your first language without weasel words. Trust me, if you say that English is not your first language but it is the one you use most often now, this whole conversation will go much better for you.
I await your next attempt to change the subject.
I thought you were kidding. English is my native tongue. It is the language I use more than any other.
And no, it is not "because of his association with Norquist." Gaffney's point, in this and other columns, is that it is Khan's association with Norquist - among others - that renders him suspect. In fact the original article is a hit piece on Khan, not Norquist.