Skip to comments.
Plan: bar boozing minors from road
Arizona Daily Star - CAPITOL MEDIA SERVICES ^
| Howard Fischer
Posted on 02/19/2007 2:43:06 PM PST by SandRat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
1
posted on
02/19/2007 2:43:09 PM PST
by
SandRat
To: SandRat
Ah... another plan to increase the number of insured drivers.
To: M. Dodge Thomas
3
posted on
02/19/2007 2:47:00 PM PST
by
Domicile of Doom
(Center amber dot on head and squeeze for best results)
To: M. Dodge Thomas
Ah... another plan to increase the number of insured drivers. I assume you meant uninsured.
4
posted on
02/19/2007 2:47:47 PM PST
by
wizecrakker
(Trying to behave)
To: SandRat
The Nanny State.
While driving home from the dentist today I heard an ad on our local classical music station from a "public interest" group that wants the Vermont legislature to outlaw idling your car. This is to protect the environment and ensure that children breathe purer air.
The ad solicted contributions for their lobbying efforts. I'll bet they get some, too.
5
posted on
02/19/2007 2:48:22 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: SandRat
How did I ever survive....?
6
posted on
02/19/2007 2:48:46 PM PST
by
dakine
To: M. Dodge Thomas
A drinking age of 21 is ridiculous. It just places booze on a pedestal and makes our kids go nuts come high school and college. In Europe where they have more sensible drinking ages and attitudes towards drinking you don't see anywhere near as many kids going off the deep end. It just isn't that big a deal when you've been having a glass of wine at dinner since age 10 and can go to the pub to grab a beer and watch a football match from 16.
To: SandRat
Current laws on minors in possession of alcohol cover only those younger than 18. (Scratching my head).
Aren't all minors younger then 18?
8
posted on
02/19/2007 2:52:37 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(It's time our lawmakers paid more attention to their responsibilities, and less to their privileges.)
To: M. Dodge Thomas
Illegals will not be affected...
9
posted on
02/19/2007 2:54:06 PM PST
by
johnny7
("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
To: Michael.SF.
They seem to want to cover to age 21.
To: Cicero
Driving since I was 14. Good thing the nanny state wasn't around as much back then...I'd of had a bumpersticker out of the front of my grill, one that looked like today's dhimmicrat.
11
posted on
02/19/2007 2:57:15 PM PST
by
Issaquahking
(Pardon Compean and Ramos Now!)
To: johnny7
Illegals will not be affected...Very true indeed. And these kids won't stop driving anyway, just uninsured and driving revoked. Taking a license only works on 25% of offenders. (I've seen that stat somewhere before)
To: SmoothTalker
In Europe where they have more sensible drinking ages and attitudes towards drinking And in Europe: Prostitution is legal (they keep their whores in glass windowed booths for public display), Sex between a 16 year old girl and a 26 year old man is OK, you can buy Marijuana at Drive up windows and smoke hash in designated 'coffee houses'.
Just because they do it in Europe, does not make it right.
13
posted on
02/19/2007 2:58:59 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(It's time our lawmakers paid more attention to their responsibilities, and less to their privileges.)
To: Michael.SF.
14
posted on
02/19/2007 2:59:07 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
The drinking age simply needs to be lowered to 18 or 19.
Lower the drinking age, and most of these "underage" offenses will decline.
To: eyedigress
Yes, that was their intent, but that is not what the poorly worded sentence stated.
I think we need four terms (legally speaking) in regards to the ages of the young:
Children -- those younger than 14
Minors -- 14 to 17
Youths -- 18 to 20
Adults -- 21 +
16
posted on
02/19/2007 3:04:27 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(It's time our lawmakers paid more attention to their responsibilities, and less to their privileges.)
To: SandRat
This bill, she said, deals with the other half of the problem.Does this mean that from now on legislators will lose their seat if caught drinking and driving?
17
posted on
02/19/2007 3:07:20 PM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: EGPWS

surely you jest? They're SPECIAL! Laws they make don't apply to them.
18
posted on
02/19/2007 3:10:44 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
This would be a stupid law. How many 19-20 yr old people may be married with a wife and kids to support? The nanny stater's are going to pull their license for 2 years and put their family on welfare because they had a beer?
How about our troops in the military home on leave? Idiots shouldn't be elected and writing laws if they lack the greymatter to think about what they are asking for.
19
posted on
02/19/2007 3:16:15 PM PST
by
Beagle8U
(Jimmy Carter changed me into a Republican.......R. W. Reagan made me DAMN proud of it!)
To: Michael.SF.
"Just because they do it in Europe, does not make it right."
Of course and thats an absolute strawman argument. They don't have everything right and we in the US are better when it comes to most policies. Drinking is an exception. They have a much more sensible policy regarding drinking.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson