Heard a legalist Court Party sycophant whining on the radio this morning as to what 'litmus test' could possibly be employed by Harper to identify pro law & order candidates to the Judiciary.
Naturally, he could only suggest documented past support for leftist bug-a-boos like capital punishment, right-to-life causes, etc but, there's plainly a far more simple one:
No one with their head even halfway screwed on right will have a record of making financial contributions to the Liberal Party - for a host of good 'sound judgment' reasons! - for at least the past decade.
1 posted on
02/19/2007 12:05:01 PM PST by
GMMAC
To: fanfan; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; Ryle; ...
PING!
2 posted on
02/19/2007 12:06:53 PM PST by
GMMAC
(Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
To: GMMAC
The Canadians sold their souls to the lefties. What are you going to do now?
3 posted on
02/19/2007 12:08:15 PM PST by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
To: GMMAC
Seven have a vote on each potential judicial nominee, while the eighth member --a sitting judge--acts only in case of a tie. Scratching head...
I don't understand. Must be that dang Plucky metric system or something...
4 posted on
02/19/2007 12:08:23 PM PST by
Philistone
(Your existence as a non-believer offends the Prophet(MPBUH).)
Canadian liberals even mimic the talking points of their American counterparts.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson