You thought IowaHawk's humor was top of the line. It really wasn't. I've read IowaHawk's stuff on the John Edwards Bloggers. What made it work was how righteously snotty it was. His self-parody in what you linked to, just simply, wasn't funny; it tried way too hard. And not comparable to the 1/2 News Hour Show.
And because I/others didn't find it funny, you think this proves a negative. It doesn't.
I don't think Will Ferrell is funny, and that's how the link to IowaHawk came across -- as a Will Ferrell wanna be.
When you and Iowahawk get your work funded and produced on Foxnews, come back and ask me then what I thought.
You continue to play bait and switch games.
You want a comedy show which makes liberals *hate*. As tho that's gonna wake them up? Make them hate, and you get happy. No. And recent elections prove you dead wrong.
Surnow in this pilot has laid out a tenor. You don't think that tenor is mean enough. It's his show. You didn't like it. In order to prove your point you use false premises to argue in support of your theory of humor. And, that "people like me" are just too stupid to get it. Of course, you asserted this after vaunting a FOX conspiracy.
You are your own comedy show, Yardstick.
Most the people on this thread enjoyed Surnow's first pilot. And that makes you so upset, because me/they are too stupid to *get* the humor you find funny.
You've got issues. You feel like a loser, you act like a loser, and you want everyone to feel just like you.
Too bad!
His self-parody in what you linked to, just simply, wasn't funny; it tried way too hard.
If IowaHawk's review is so overbearing in its attempt to be funny, why were you unable to detect its sarcasm until I pointed it out to you?