What you've read is sharp and cutting, and very sarcastic, which is how the game is played these days.
You poor soul, all writ up and no place to show.
What?
Now I don't even know what you're talkin' about, Grandpa.
Goodness, anyone who *CAN* actually write this type of show better than Surnow is obviously in no position to do so.
It's not that people aren't available to write a better show. It's that Fox has chosen not to write a better show because they're afraid that if they did, people like you would be utterly BEFUDDLED by it and wouldn't watch it.
Maybe a good nap would help you to understand.
You got proof of this?
I didn't think so.
You are pushing an agenda, liberal style. In lieu of facts, you ad hominem. And consider your ego-central self as superior, when in fact, bullying is more your style.
You sound just like a liberal, yarkstick. They too, always know what is "best" for people.. and because "people are too stupid" to know what they want, need, like or don't like.
There are some sharp posters in this thread -- some who liked the show, some who had issues with the show.
But the silliest, most inane poster of this thread, is you.
Check your premises: I think you've confused insults with "sharp and intelligent".
Furthermore, and lastly while you think the blogs you've cited are A-1, others might not.
It's one thing to write one or two "brilliant" blog items or columns, it's another to churn out that brilliance day after day after day.
It's partly why Rush is a winner -- he has a fine and provable track record of wins. Dittos, Joel Surnow. He too has a successful track record.
You don't.
Sleep on it.