Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jmc813
It's kinda nice not having the majority of threads turn into $hitstorms.

Yeah, I guess that's the one benefit of stifling dissent.

583 posted on 05/21/2007 10:33:21 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone

stifling dissent? Oh come on.. I feel bad a few good folks are no longer here but that was their choice to carry on and spar as they did..

I still scratch my head over why some started so darn early and so darn hard, only to blow a lot of good folks out of the water along with them as the battle intensified.

btw, I’d love to have seen it happen on the California threads long ago where sane folks endured haranguing continually for backing conservative candidates during and since the Recall until the recent departures of a few Progre$$ive shills who sold out hard for aRnie and the Kennedys and their socialist hugging agenda. We see the price for going down that path all too clearly.


585 posted on 05/21/2007 10:42:05 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... For want of a few good men, a once great nation was lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
Yeah, I guess that's the one benefit of stifling dissent.

It's unfortunate, but some dissent needs to be stifled if a forum is to work to achieve its stated goals. The new forum, for instance, has a strict policy against promoting third-party candidates and has banned people for doing such. I say all the power to them, as allowing such would dilute the activism they are trying to accomplish. Likewise, FR management decided that supporting Giuliani was not the direction they wanted FR to go in, and acted accordingly.

I like a good flame war as much as anyone, but it was really getting to the point of ridiculousness. I read way too many nasty comments between people on both sides who I considered "FR friends" and could not jump in without offending both parties.

Some of the people that have moved on were folks I grew quite a liking fr, despite disagreeing on some things, and yes, it sucks that I'm not going to be able to communicate with them any more. But I really do think this was for the better. As I mentioned, FR is much more pleasant, and the new forum seems to be having some degree of success, and as far as I can tell, with a few exceptions, people are getting along over there.

589 posted on 05/21/2007 10:56:36 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone; Texas Federalist
"...conservatives will be relegated to the same status as libertarians - a vocal, intellectual, and irrelvant minority."

"566 posted on 05/21/2007 9:11:41 AM PDT by Texas Federalist"

This is the "stifling of dissent" that will occur with any of the current declared leading candidates with maybe one exception!!!

It's good to see you back defending your point of view. At least you were never abjectly obnoxious!!! Not even close!!!

598 posted on 05/21/2007 12:18:09 PM PDT by SierraWasp (CA!!! Are you ready to rumble *??? Or are ya just gonna mumble and grumble??? (*aka "Recall"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
We are the dissent.
600 posted on 05/21/2007 12:55:49 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson