And actually, he really doesn't! If you knew political history, you would know that recent history shows that is not accurate to the degree you claim.
Actually he really does. Here's Dame Guliani in his own words:
I've said that I'll uphold a woman's right of choice, that I will fund abortion so that a poor woman is not deprived of a right that others can exercise, and that I would oppose going back to a day in which abortions were illegal.
Now I don't know what things are like on your world, but here on Earth that's pretty unequivocal support for murdering unborn children. And by the way when he says he'll fund abortion he doesn't mean he'll dig out the Guliani family checkbook and cover it himself. He means he'll force, and I do mean force, me to pay for it.
He not only supports it, he said he'd pay for his own daughter to have an abortion. Once again here's Madame Guliani in his own words:
But if the ultimate choice of the woman - my daughter or any other woman - would be that in this particular circumstance [if she had] to have an abortion, I'd support that. I'd give my daughter the money for it.
So we are stuck in a bit of a quandry. Whom are we to believe? We can believe you who says Dame Guliani doesn't support abortion or we can believe Madame Mayors own words on the subject.
Now I hate to be harsh but in short dear lady, you're lying. In fact you're lying your ass off.
So is Rudy for that matter.
L