If the conservative members of a conservative party select a winning conservative candidate based on a winning conservative platform that the vast majority of said conservative members of said conservative party agree with to a "T," then the platform of said conservative party will contain the winning conservative planks of said winning conservative candidate.
And I'll eat my hat if it turns out otherwise.
Conversely, if a non conservative candidate is selected by the vast majority of the members, then I will guarantee you that at least one or more (and it's probably more) of the conservative planks listed above will be missing or misrepresented.
Would you like that hat plain, or with a sauce?
Jim my friend it's you who is missing the point.
\ nopardons doesn't care about 'conservative' positions because she's not a conservative.
She doesn't want a 'conservative' Party platform because she's not a conservative.
She doesn't want a pro-2nd Amendment conservative candidate because she's not a pro-2nd Amendment conservative herself.
She doesn't want an anti-abortion conservative candidate because she's not an anti-abortion conservative herself.
She doesn't want a secure borders anti-illegal immigration conservative on the ticket because she's not one herself.
She wants a candidate who reflects her idea of the Republican party. In short, Madame Guliani is her perfect candidate because he reflects her core political beliefs most closely.
So in short my friend what you're doing is akin to trying to teach a pig to sing. It's wasting your time, and obviously it's quite annoying to the pig.
Leave her to stew with her liberal friends. When the primaries come around and Dame Guliani gets trounced maybe she'll see the error of her ways.
Personally I doubt it but who knows. Stranger things have happened.
Best.
L