I read your article and looked for the name of the wonderful Conservative candidate you described. I did not see the name of this candidate.
As much as I agree with you, I have no knowledge of a candidate like this who has the ability to win a National Presidential Election in 2008.
I read your article and looked for the name of the wonderful Conservative candidate you described. I did not see the name of this candidate. As much as I agree with you, I have no knowledge of a candidate like this who has the ability to win a National Presidential Election in 2008.
***The name of the conservative candidate is Duncan Hunter. JimRob is talking about some of the threads he was on very recently. I suspect there is something holding Jim back from outright endorsing Duncan Hunter, I don't know what it is -- maybe something to do with how this site is set up and its tax status. So it is up to the individual Freeper to do the (very simple) math. There is only 1 declared candidate who fits this bill -- Duncan Hunter. If JimRob can't spell it out for you, then let another Freeper.
I think you missed the point. A candidate who adopts that platform will win. Several contenders I know of (Hunter, Tancredo) agree with most if not all of it, and I am sure there are others. Of course, the candidate need to raise money, do well in debates, etc., but THESE ISSUES will win it. A Democrat-lite candidate won't
So which of our conservative planks should we remove and replace with socialist planks?