To: LtdGovt
"Nice try, but marriage is defined at the stat level."Hmm ok, so what you are saying is that the President of these United States plays absolutely no role in a Marriage bill? Suppose the House and Senate pass a bill that says states that do not support gay marriage can no longer receive Federal monies for anything?
I will give you one very big example, Seat Belt Laws.
74 posted on
02/18/2007 3:11:16 PM PST by
Post-Neolithic
(Money only makes Communists rich Communists)
To: Post-Neolithic
Hmm ok, so what you are saying is that the President of these United States plays absolutely no role in a Marriage bill? Suppose the House and Senate pass a bill that says states that do not support gay marriage can no longer receive Federal monies for anything?
In that case, yes, but don't hold your breath. Such a bill is not going to be passed in a hundred years.
81 posted on
02/18/2007 3:13:49 PM PST by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson