"We have had almost 16 years of avowedly Pro-Life Presidents. Abortion is still legal."
So putting in a pro-abortion president is the way to go?
And no, we haven't had 16 years of pro-life presidents. At least not in a row recently. Your moronic post forgot to mention the eight years of Bill Clinton, and his appointments of Breyer and Ginsberg. Justice White was pro-life and was replaced by one of those two clowns Clinton put on the U.S. supreme court.
"We have had almost 16 years of avowedly Pro-Life Presidents. Abortion is still legal."
No need to call people who disagree with you, "moron".
Eight years of Ronald Reagan plus almost eight of GWB sure adds up to 16 to me.
The point is that the POTUS can do very little to influence these social issues, which are really issues that belong to the States to decide, not the Federal Government.
Rudy has stated he would appoint Judges who would apponi strict constructtionists in the mold of Scalia, Alito, and Roberts.
In the face of Hillary Clinton who would have a pro-choice Litmus Test and appoint judges like Janet Reno and Lani Guenier, that is fine with me.