An old saw in trial law says when you don't have the facts in your favor, argue the law and when you don't have the law in your favor, bang your fists on the table.
You really should stop before you break something in your hands.
I notice you failed to answer the question. Got another "saw" in trial law to explain that?
OMG I know this wasnt posted to me, but for cryin out loud its in HIS TAGLINE.
Oh, defeating the Dems in 2008 is going to be very difficult for any GOP nominee.
However, I can tell you a strategy that history has shown cannot work.
Run so far left that a sizeable third-party movement forms. And give no reason for anyone to cross party lines for you.
Rudy will not be able to hold the party together. And he will give no reason for pro-life and pro-gun Dems to cross over. And he will have little luck attracting independents and Dems as a pro-war candidate, since the Iraq War is becoming more unpopular in that segment with each passing day.
I am not so arrogant as to know what can win. But it should be blindingly obvious that Rudy can't win.
But I'll bet he can post another 'Oldie but Goody' picture of Rudy in a dress.
Or maybe their candidate comparison chart that depicts Hillary's position on the WOT as if she were Tommy Franks.
Would be interesting to hear thoughts on his candidate. Kinda sounding like Hillary might be their man.
All right. Here's a question for you: suppose it's a race between Rudy and Hillary. Which would be a better use of $1,000?