Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mountn man
The nanny says you can only have 3 shots in your gun, because this, this and this.

As they also set a season, and decide bag limits. Are you against collective decisions on hunting seasons and bag limits as well? That is after all a far greater limitation.

60 posted on 02/18/2007 1:03:46 PM PST by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan
As they also set a season, and decide bag limits. Are you against collective decisions on hunting seasons and bag limits as well? That is after all a far greater limitation.

As far as bag limits, if there were none, it would be easy to thin animal population. And that has nothing to do with dumbing down hunters. Limiting someone to lets say 2 deer, if every hunter got 3, that would be a 50% increase and could destroy animal populations.

It doesn't take much to figure, we have x amount of deer, so we'll allow y amount of hunters, to get z amount.

The alternative would be, that 4 guys go hunting for a week. They each bag 5 deer. Not because they're trigger happy, but they each have families at home they feed. If everyone who hunted did that the deer population would get ruined. It has nothing to do with wisdom or lack of wisdom. I might need/could use 5 deer. I have no idea the needs or desires of my neighbor, or the entire hunting community.

To compare bag limits with gun limits is irrational. They are to different issues.

As far as seasons go, that is tough. There can be arguments for both sides of that one.

Personally I think someone should have the right to hunt on their own land anytime they want. If they need/want a fresh deer in July, they should have at it.

Back to gun limits, why should Uncle Sally care how many rounds I have.

A comparable argument would be, we have a 55 or 65, maybe 70 mph speed limit. That means cars with v-8, v-10, or v-12 engines cause people to drive to fast, so we should outlaw all cars with large engines, and mandate manufacturers to put limiters in cars that would limit cars to speed limits dictated by sensors placed in the roads. Any one with a beautiful shiny Ferrari, capable of 160 mph, should turn it in. (as well as anybody with a motorcycle that can do the same)

Just because there are 2 million deer doesn't mean I'm going to shoot them all. But 50,000 deer hunters shooting 5 deer each would decimate the population. So a bag limit is set.

And just because I have 50 rounds in my gun doesn't mean I'm going to pull the trigger at every moving leaf.

Like wise, driving 70 mph, on a two lane road, in a residential area, in a school zone with 6 year old kids around isn't wise. Some kid is going to get killed. So a regulation (speed limit) is established, to protect the neighborhood.

Now my car has the capability of doing 70 mph on the highway and also doing 70 mph in the school zone. Should everybodies car be taken away from them in a school zone?

In a school zone, a cop doesn't care what your car CAN do, he cares what its doing in the speed zone.

Why does a ranger or DNR agent care how many bullets your gun CAN shoot. Its how many you shoot at a moment in time.

93 posted on 02/18/2007 1:56:26 PM PST by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson