Posted on 02/18/2007 11:32:57 AM PST by xsrdx
As I write this, I'm hunting coyotes in southeastern Wyoming with Eddie Stevenson, PR Manager for Remington Arms, Greg Dennison, who is senior research engineer for Remington, and several writers. We're testing Remington's brand new .17 cal Spitfire bullet on coyotes.
I must be living in a vacuum. The guides on our hunt tell me that the use of AR and AK rifles have a rapidly growing following among hunters, especially prairie dog hunters. I had no clue. Only once in my life have I ever seen anyone using one of these firearms.
I call them "assault" rifles, which may upset some people. Excuse me, maybe I'm a traditionalist, but I see no place for these weapons among our hunting fraternity. I'll go so far as to call them "terrorist" rifles. They tell me that some companies are producing assault rifles that are "tackdrivers."
Sorry, folks, in my humble opinion, these things have no place in hunting. We don't need to be lumped into the group of people who terrorize the world with them, which is an obvious concern. I've always been comfortable with the statement that hunters don't use assault rifles. We've always been proud of our "sporting firearms."
This really has me concerned. As hunters, we don't need the image of walking around the woods carrying one of these weapons. To most of the public, an assault rifle is a terrifying thing. Let's divorce ourselves from them. I say game departments should ban them from the praries and woods.
However, Zumbo is trampling on the 2nd amendment with this issue. Owning these weapons has nothing to do with hunting whatsoever. If people choose to use them for hunting, that is totally incidental. At one point the most advanced weapons that were used on the battlefield were also the person's hunting arm. What's the difference? Now we STILL use those weapons for hunting, along with those firearms of newer technology.
A well regulated Militia hunting party being necessary to the security of a free State look good to clueless Liberals and Soccermoms, the right licensed privilege of the snobbish people to keep correctly store and bear expensive bolt action rifles and other nonthreatening looking Firearms shall not be infringed unless they intimidate "sensitive" people.
There. Maybe that will make the likes of Jim Zumbo and his high-end hunting buddies happy...
That sounds like a good start from Remington. It's not enough, but it's a start.
"Sorry, folks, in my humble opinion, these things have no place in hunting. We don't need to be lumped into the group of people who terrorize the world with them, which is an obvious concern. I've always been comfortable with the statement that hunters don't use assault rifles. We've always been proud of our 'sporting firearms.'"
What is my Norinco MAK-90 if it's not a highly portable rifle that I can use for self-defense AND hunting? Oh, right, an assault weapon, I guess I forgot the proper Newspeak. Just another reason to skip Outdoor Life.
What a brainless jerk this Zumbo is ~ the 2nd Amendment isn't about hunting, it's about the Right to Keep and Bear Arms!
If Remington is one of his big sponsors, I think Zumbo just bit one of the hands that feeds him. The original ArmaLite AR-15 was chambered for a varmint-hunting round, the .223 REMINGTON.
Yet in many parts of Europe, hunters can buy a silencer at the hardware store, it's considered civilized not to make noise.
The beauty of hunting prairie dogs with an accurized AR-15 style rifle is that you can see your impacts through the scope and you have the ability to administer a follow-up shot.
Looks like the intended affect was achieved. I expected no less from Remington, they are and have been staunch RKBA advocates.
Nice to see companies rushing to distance themselves from this nut.
LOL that's, of course, exactly what it is!
I get so tired of these people who are supposed to be 'on our side' turning tail and running with the libs, giving aid and comfort to our enemy.
Yes, from the last line in their statement it sounds like it will most likely be quick and permanent.
Remington does not agree with Zumbo in any way shape or form and we will assess our relationship with him accordingly.
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/businesses/detail/time_inc/index.html
This dumba$$ must not be one of those "the hunt is the reward" guys. When hunting coyote I often have 5-7 in the field of fire. If I had to stop and reload the body count would go down. Hunting big game is different. Hunting Coyotes is extermination of vermin. I see no difference from when we were kids and killed rats at the dump with a Nylon 66 - just as fast ans a many as we could.
The blog comments are priceless. His other entries have 20, 30 comments - this baby has over 2000 and counting.
Jim's gonna have a rough Monday back at work I'll bet. His phone has to be ringing off the hook.
I'm sitting here trying to figure out why he is OK with Remington developing new weapons e.g. the .17 cal with all its advantages for varminting... etc. Why, his .270 or .243 or whatever he's used in the past wasn't good enough? Seems like most people have been doing fine without the .17 cal for some time, why don't they just continue with older weapons? Hmmm me detects a little cognitive dissonance here... Zumbo is a hypocrite. Maybe he should just tell us all to spraypaint our AR's hunter orange so that people can tell they aren't assault weapons. Or maybe all hunting weapons should be a nice lavender/pink so that we know for sure they aren't terrorists that are using them.
If I recall, the last weapons terrorists used against us were airplanes. And our military carries 'terrorist weapons. I guess that makes them 'look like terrorists' too to him. Maybe they should carry a bouquet of roses and a box of chocolates?
AAAAAUGH!!! /end rant
That's why I call his response a 'start' - it is still a big old WHINE directed at those who by free choice keep their company in the black. I think we free-market patrons really deserve a little more respect.
Mark
Like in NZ, where hunting is open year round and they have no animal shortages... or do they, shaggy?
If only it were that way in the US.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.