[Fishtalk]

Every item on your list is true.

Bush never fought back.

Here's my question...one of your line items includes the caveat (not a word about Clinton sleepovers; coffees, all for cash)...as one item that the Lamestream overlooked.

So why doesn't the PRESIDENT point this out?

Y'all seem to think the Lamestream has ALL this power, which is does. But a President who kept correcting their lies would get attention, yes he would.

To keep defending Bush's lackluster and hardly inspiring leadership, especially of late, by blaming the Media is sooooooo lame.

The man doesn't even try.

[txradioguy]

He can corect them all he wants to Fish..but at the end of the day...it is the Media that controls what the people hear during the next news cycle via how the story is written...the soundbites they use and the other people interviewed for the story.

So unless you see what he says "live"...you will never truly know what the President said or didn't say thanks to the fifth colum in the DBM.

[Alas Babylon!]

Ok, even if you what you say is true with regard to the Pres never defending himself (and I disagree that he does this), then where are the rest of us???

During the Whitewater/Lewinsky scandals, hundreds of dem spokesmouths went out to vigorously defend Clinton. Where are our Bush defenders? LOL, joining, in many cases, the Bush basheres!!!!

If Republicans and conservatives "pundits" spend 1/8 of the effort defending this Pres as the Clintonistas did theirs we wouldn't even be having this conversation.

Many a dem had written an op-ed as to why Clinton was being worngly attacked in my local rag, the Montgomery (Ala) Advertiser. Not one op-ed supporting Pres Bush, though, through his host of media generated "troubles". I continously hound my Congressional delegation as to why they never go to bat for the Pres. It's shameful.