Yeah. Those who play both sides of the fence usually do end up being despised by both sides.
It's one of the reasons RINOS always do end up being worse than useless.
2005-06 Mass Scorecard for Gubernatorial candidate Mitt RomneyPLEASE NOTE: THIS IS A DRAFT WEBSITE WITH INCOMPLETE VOTING RECORDS |
|
Republican (retiring 2006) | |
Office: Office of the Governor, State House, Rm 360, Boston MA 02133 | |
Phone: (617) (617) 725-4005 | |
E-mail: Non-published | |
Website: http://mass.gov/?pageID=gov2homepage&L=1&L0=Home&sid=Agov2 | |
Vote selection and interpretation by representatives of Mass Scorecard without approval or participation from the Massachusetts Democratic Party.
|
Fundamental Issue in MassDems' Party Platform (Click for full text of platform section) |
Summary of related issue put to vote (Click for gubernatorial candidate's related statement) |
This candidate's stance on this issue | Party platform on this issue |
---|---|---|---|
Part I: CIVIL RIGHTS Clause 9: Same-sex marriage |
Sep 14, 2005:Affirming marriage for heterosexuals only | Romney: YES | Platform: NO |
Part II: HEALTH CARE Clause 14: Stem cell research |
May 31, 2005:Overriding veto on Stem Cell Research Bill | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Clause 16 & 17: Mental health | Jul 14, 2005:Maintaining two state psychiatric hospitals | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Clause 11 & 12: MassHealth | Nov 3, 2005:Increasing benefits under MassHealth | Romney: YES | Platform: YES |
Mental Health | Jul 10, 2003:Veto override of "Turning 22" mental disability program | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Part III: EDUCATION No Child Left Behind |
Jul 10, 2003:Veto override of federal school breakfast supplement | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Full Funding | Jul 20, 2004:moratorium on expansion of charter schools | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Part IV: ECONOMIC GROWTH Workforce Training |
Jan 13, 2004:investing in emerging technologies, math & science Fund. | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Part V: LABOR Clause 13: Immigrant rights |
Jan 11, 2006:Allowing in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Part VI: HOUSING Clause 1 & 3: Homelessness |
Jul 14, 2005:Veto override for $220K for homelessness | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Clause 5: Housing subsidy | Nov 3, 2005:$2 million for Mass Rental Voucher Program | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Part VII: SOCIAL SECURITY Clause 3: Safety net |
Jul 14, 2005:Studying how MA can overcome federal workfare rules | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Clause 2 and 3: Safety net | Sep 22, 2005:Restricting welfare benefits to 5 years | Romney: YES | Platform: NO |
Persons with Disabilities | Jul 10, 2003:Veto override of $200K reduction to blind job program | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Persons with Disabilities | Jul 10, 2003:Veto override of $900K for disability & mentoring aid | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Urban Investment | Jul 8, 2004:rejecting $25M earmarked for Housing Trust Fund | Romney: YES | Platform: NO |
Part VIII: ENVIRONMENT Safeguarding Natural Resources |
Nov 17, 2003:Veto override to keep park maintenance funding within MDC | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Toxics Use Reductions | Jul 30, 2004:requiring dental amalgam (mercury) separators | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Part IX: CONSUMER PROTECTION | (No votes on which to base response) | ||
Part X: SAFETY AND CRIME Clause 3: Death penalty |
Nov 15, 2005:Reinstating capital punishment | Romney: YES | Platform: NO |
Legal Services | Jul 10, 2003:Veto override of Mass Correctional Legal Services | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Crime Prevention | Feb 10, 2004:earmarking funds for women's substance abuse program | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Part XI: VOTING PROCEDURES | (No votes on which to base response) | ||
Part XII: TAXES AND SERVICES Clause 1: Condemn tax cuts |
Oct 18, 2005:Postponing reduction of income tax to 5% | Romney: NO | Platform: YES |
Number of votes in 2005-06 in accord with Democratic Party Platform: | 1 out of 22 votes. | ||
Summary letter grade: A=90% or better; B=80%; C=70%; D=60%; F=below 60% |
F |
Accord with the Democratic Party Platform is determined by representatives of Mass Scorecard and has no approval by nor association with the Massachusetts Democratic Party.