[jr48154]

Nice article. I'm not quite sold on Romney (as of now, I'm praying Hunter can make history). And I can understand the skepticism. BUT... why is it that I can never find anyone who's happy about Romney's about-face on abortion?

Aren't we in the pro-life movement trying to convert people? And, if so, why do we lambaste someone who's been converted?

Romney's conversion is what makes him attractive to me as a pro-lifer. Here we have a candidate that not only is pro-life, but because of his change of positioning on the subject is forced to talk about it on the stump.

I think that'll give us some publicity for the pro-life cause that we wouldn't otherwise get in the MSM.

If for no other reason, that's why I'm glad Romney's in the race...

[EternalVigilance]

Because his so-called "conversion" is not even close to believable.

This is the King of parsers, a man who has been known to take two sides of important issues in, literally, one breath.