Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wallace T.
America does not need a Rudy McRomney. The borders would remain porous, we would continue waging a no win war in Iraq and Afghanistan, social programs would continue to expand, and new mandates would continue to be imposed. Would Rudy McRomney be better than Hillary or Obama? Maybe, if you think slow death via cancer is better than a massive heart attack.

I'm not sure who you support for the Presidency but I can assure you that you won't gain any support for that candidate with this kind of rhetoric. I'm not sure who I will support just yet. There is a long ways to go. One thing for sure I won't vote third party or for Hillary. My advice would be for you to work to get your candidate nominated if you don't like Rudy. I might eventually help you get it done. Tearing down other's choice of candidates at this time will not help your candidate or prevent a President Hillary.

322 posted on 02/17/2007 10:21:16 PM PST by jerry639
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: jerry639

We are, of course, 17 months away from the GOP convention and 20 months away from the general election. Any one of the candidates might be found with a "live boy or a dead girl" or can shoot themselves in the foot with stupid statements. (Hillary is extremely vulnerable in this area, BTW.) In any case, almost 75 years of expanding government and shrinking personal freedom must be reversed. The track records of the three Republican front runners offer little hope of any progress, and the party leadership and the large contributors must be made aware of the intensity of dissatisfaction with these candidates.


367 posted on 02/19/2007 12:21:43 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson