[muawiyah]

Lieberman is right about a Constitutional crisis coming down the pike, but he's wrong about it being between two branches of government.

Rather, it's going to be a rather bloody civil war, and if we're lucky, this time we'll come out of it without any more Democrats.

[FatherofFive]

Rather, it's going to be a rather bloody civil war, and if we're lucky, this time we'll come out of it without any more Democrats.

Good thing the Libs are against gun ownership. Sort of guarantees there won't be dems left.

[fr_freak]

Rather, it's going to be a rather bloody civil war, and if we're lucky, this time we'll come out of it without any more Democrats.

It won't be luck that rids us of Democrats. It will be good aim.

[Digger]

Lieberman is right about a Constitutional crisis coming down the pike, but he's wrong about it being between two branches of government. Rather, it's going to be a rather bloody civil war, and if we're lucky, this time we'll come out of it without any more Democrats.

Let's get it on. These little snivelings wll run to France when the going gets tough.

[Publius]

From The Astrological Chart of the United States, by Gar Osten, published in 1976.

2007-08

Progressed Mars retrograde – the planet of war, internal strife and division – is likely to be serious because of its close proximity to the US Saturn, which rules the 8th House (mortality). This points to the beginning of an 87 year cycle of intense activity, with particular emphasis upon the military and armed forces. It could mark the rise of a dictatorship, with 2031-32 being especially dangerous. There is also considerable emphasis upon the 11th House (Congress and the states), which could suggest the elimination of the presidency in favor of collective leadership of some kind because of a national emergency. The 6th House emphasis (working class) suggests some kind of rebellion, civil war or warlike action, with heavy loss of life. This is the first retrograde action of progressed Mars since the beginning of US history. Previous contacts between progressed Mars and Saturn in 1812 brought a war with Britain, and in 1979 a warlike situation with Iran.

[palmer]

Rather, it's going to be a rather bloody civil war, and if we're lucky, this time we'll come out of it without any more Democrats.

I assume nonbinding resolutions from politicians who were elected to do that are ok? If there is a binding resolution cutting off funding for Iraq would you propose starting a civil war over that? I'd like to know where you draw your line. Personally I draw it when someone suggests violent response to political processes.