Skip to comments.
Fired U.S. Attorney failed to investigate election fraud
Evergreen Freedom Foundation ^
| 2-16-07
Posted on 02/16/2007 1:32:35 PM PST by truth49
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
02/16/2007 1:32:38 PM PST
by
truth49
To: truth49
2
posted on
02/16/2007 1:43:45 PM PST
by
Enterprise
(Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
To: truth49
Well, if this is why he was fired, it looks as if Gonzalez finally did something right.
3
posted on
02/16/2007 1:45:04 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: truth49
McKay participated in the same old govt employee practice "pass the buck" instead of "the buck stops here" mentality.
4
posted on
02/16/2007 1:48:33 PM PST
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: Cicero
Well, if this is why he was fired, it looks as if Gonzalez finally did something right. In that case, it probably wasn't the reason.
5
posted on
02/16/2007 1:48:38 PM PST
by
Grut
To: truth49
"...Did our complaint play a part in McKays firing? Its hard to say...." (But we hope so!)
;-)
6
posted on
02/16/2007 1:56:14 PM PST
by
Islander7
("Show me an honest politician and I will show you a case of mistaken identity.")
To: truth49
Appointed in Oct. 2001 by President Bush.
Sounds like he lacked the testicles to go after the Democrat machine that controls most of Washington's politics.
7
posted on
02/16/2007 2:09:25 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(It's time our lawmakers paid more attention to their responsibilities, and less to their privileges.)
To: Enterprise
To: Pete from Shawnee Mission
If the reason really was that he lacked the courage to go after Democrat corruption, then good riddance to a yellow striped punk.
9
posted on
02/16/2007 5:42:44 PM PST
by
Enterprise
(Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
To: truth49
I wonder what the democrat party was blackmailing him with for him not to do his job ...............I mean all republicans have spines of steel...........right
10
posted on
02/16/2007 5:54:16 PM PST
by
JZoback
(Grandma Pelosi will give milk and cookies to Osama and he will be a good boy !!!)
To: Enterprise
Hard to know what goes on behind the scenes. Perhaps they found out he was an evil crypto-democrat rather than a sniveling RINO. (A distinction without a difference?)
To: Michael.SF.
You mean Johnny Sutton and this clown were both appointed by Bush?
Huh, go figure. Must be coincidence.
12
posted on
02/16/2007 6:00:12 PM PST
by
mgstarr
(I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore.)
To: Cicero
There were several factors in this firing but I am pretty sure the overall performance of the office was the main reason.
They did not prosecute enough cases during his tenure.
13
posted on
02/16/2007 6:04:54 PM PST
by
volunbeer
(Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
To: mgstarr
Yep, we're not supposed to believe the cold hard facts. Bush is either so far up in his ivory tower and ignorant of what has been going on with Johnny Sutton and his framing prosecution of the border agents, or he's in on the con.
There isn't any gray area here, and I'm sick of the stalling on a pardon for both of these brave AMERICAN BORDER AGENTS.
14
posted on
02/16/2007 6:07:02 PM PST
by
demkicker
(In the minority or majority, I'll never stop kicking dems)
To: demkicker
There's a reason they're political appointees...
There's a greater political element to fed prosecution than most people would either believe or want to know. And it has very little to do with justice.
15
posted on
02/16/2007 6:13:23 PM PST
by
mgstarr
(I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore.)
To: mgstarr
Amazing is it not? If Republicans would stand up more for what is right, versus what is popular, we would all be better off.
16
posted on
02/16/2007 7:01:26 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(It's time our lawmakers paid more attention to their responsibilities, and less to their privileges.)
To: truth49
Wow, I knew that someone would uncover the reason that McKay was fired and the reason that so many of the vile Democrats were complaining about it. Feinstein is making threats of changing the appointing process back to some obsolete rule that if Bush doesn't get a replacement approved in 122 days, the judiciary committee gets to make the appointment.
17
posted on
02/16/2007 7:05:48 PM PST
by
Eva
To: Michael.SF.
If Republicans could remember what Conservatism used to be about, we'd be better off.
Strike that. Conservatism hasn't changed, it was simple hijacked.
18
posted on
02/16/2007 7:09:00 PM PST
by
mgstarr
(I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore.)
To: truth49
19
posted on
02/16/2007 7:09:49 PM PST
by
Eva
To: mgstarr
I think we both said the same thing, just phrased it differently!
20
posted on
02/16/2007 7:16:02 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(It's time our lawmakers paid more attention to their responsibilities, and less to their privileges.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson