Posted on 02/16/2007 12:57:11 PM PST by Brilliant
Couldn't they get around this by agreeing to write the homeowner policys but charging a premium of one million dollars a quarter, minimum?
They also regulate the price.
They are doing the same thing here in Fla. I don't think that it will hold up in the end, constitutionally, though, unless the penalty for violating the law is designed just right.
Here in Fla., one of the penalties for violating the law is that you won't be allowed to issue auto or life policies. Basically, you've either gotta issue all lines of insurance coverage, or you can't be in the state at all. I think that alone might pass muster, but once you start imposing fines, etc., I think you're walking on thin ice.
Exactly. There is a high casualty risk for living on the beach. What they need to do is give ins. cos more freedom to adjust their rates to those casualty risks.
I've heard many stories from Mississippi about the whole flood damage vs. wind damage shinola the insurance companies are playing, and it is shameful.
State Farm has been pulling this stuff in Mississippi for years. They only seem to do business when it's "convenient" for them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.