Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Melas
That's debatable. It's just as likely that it would increase conservative influence on the Democrat primary. I have yet to see any compelling evidence that open primaries benefit one party over the other.

I didn't say one party over the other. I said one candidate over the other within a given party's primary. Primaries by definition do not pit parties against each other.

354 posted on 02/16/2007 8:56:27 AM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
I didn't say one party over the other. I said one candidate over the other within a given party's primary. Primaries by definition do not pit parties against each other.

I understood what you said. I simply said the effect was trivial. You have to pick one primary or the other to vote in , in an open primary state. Few dems will actually give up the chance to select their own candidate to (hopefully) effect the oppositions primary, and the same holds true for Republicans crossing the line to vote in the Democrat primary.

The only exceptions are rural areas where one party is so entrenched that the primaries are often defacto general elections.

387 posted on 02/16/2007 9:42:19 AM PST by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson