It would also apply to Ronald Reagan. Does Land believe Reagan should never have been President because he was divorced and remarried? Does Land want us to believe that "social conservatives" use divorce at a litmus test in 2008 when they obviously did not in 1980?
I believe that it is the nature of Rudy and Newts divorces, and subsequent marriages.
I believe that it is the nature of Rudy and Newts divorces, and subsequent marriages that Dr. Land objects to.