Replies

"I was wondering just that! Arrested for his thoughts? As if jailtime is going to remove it!

I wonder if there's something else to it..."

Yes. There's much more to it. Try the keyword, "denazification" in a search engine. That should lead you to information on how we prevented further guerrilla wars with Nazis after World War II. Germany has continued some of those policies since then in order to keep Nazism from rising to power again.

We should be doing something more like that in Islamo-fascist terrorist areas. Then in a couple more generations, people could complain about a lack of free speech for Islamo-fascists in their nations. IMO, that's what we'll be forced to do before the current War on Terror is finished. And BTW, many neo-Nazis and their religious identity crypto-Nazi friends have written their sympathies for Islamo-fascist regimes and against our military efforts against terrorism.

Propanganda for the purpose of murdering all people of one belief system works against free speech. Such propaganda is an incitement for mass murders. Freedom of speech is for the purpose of keeping freedom in free nations--not for starting genocidal, totalitarian governments. And fascists must ban any and all speech against their political efforts in order to hold on to their preferred kind of government for even a short time.

I'll put it this way. Would Islamists be allowed to incrementally publish propaganda in Delhi toward the extermination of all Hindus in India? Or would they be jailed for incitement? And would the government in India be wise to jail them for that? In my opinion, they would.