Skip to comments.
Giuliani: Can hero of 9/11 win over his own party?
USA Today
| 02.01/2007
| By Susan Page
Posted on 02/15/2007 3:13:51 PM PST by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 201-214 next last
To: Corin Stormhands
I don't have to wait until payday to announce it... A) I could be on the payroll of one of several presidential candidates right now if I was "easy" like you.
...and I won't leave the party if he doesn't get the nomination.
B) Your support for party over principle is duly noted.
141
posted on
02/15/2007 9:11:15 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
To: Jim Robinson
No way I would EVER vote for a liberal lawyer from New York--either one of them!
142
posted on
02/15/2007 9:13:40 PM PST
by
stockstrader
("Where government advances--and it advances relentlessly--freedom is imperiled"-Janice Rogers Brown)
To: Corin Stormhands
I also note who you felt that you had to ping in that particular slanderous post. Can't handle me yourself?
143
posted on
02/15/2007 9:14:44 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
To: PhiKapMom
144
posted on
02/15/2007 9:16:16 PM PST
by
veronica
(Duncan Donuts 08...)
To: nopardons
Ah. I said both were LIBERAL hawks. That should have indicated a negative. However, that doesn't seem to matter much here lately, does it?
145
posted on
02/15/2007 9:18:12 PM PST
by
RockinRight
(When Chuck Norris goes to bed at night, he checks under the bed for Jack Bauer.)
To: Jim Robinson
"When they were told about his stance on those issues, his star dimmed. One in five Republicans said his views would "rule him out as a candidate" they could support. That included one-third of those who attend church every week, an important base of the GOP that makes up a third of party loyalists. Another 25% of Republicans said his views made them less likely to support him, nearly double the proportion who said they made them more likely to support him."
Good News! : )
146
posted on
02/15/2007 9:21:15 PM PST
by
TAdams8591
(Guilianni is a Liberal who cannot beat Hillary!)
To: hosepipe
Yet.. Fair enough. Tell him to get about convincing me otherwise.
;-)
To: EternalVigilance
I haven't been on a candidate's payroll since 1985.
To: JeanS
"if the nominee is Rudy."Let's pray it doesn't come to that!
149
posted on
02/15/2007 9:25:47 PM PST
by
TAdams8591
(Guilianni is a Democrat in Republican drag!)
To: EternalVigilance
Supporting the one party that actually defeats democrats is principled, but that fact is lost on you.
150
posted on
02/15/2007 9:28:24 PM PST
by
onyx
(DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
To: Corin Stormhands
Does he have a name? I am perplexed that you can't recognize him by my description. Perhaps you are blinded by your adoration for Rudy? That's right, I was not describing Rudy.
To: Corin Stormhands
Thanks for the ping, Corin.
Second verse, same as the first. BORING. :0)
152
posted on
02/15/2007 9:31:05 PM PST
by
onyx
(DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
To: EternalVigilance; Howlin; onyx; areafiftyone; PhiKapMom; Peach; BunnySlippers
I also note who you felt that you had to ping in that particular slanderous post. Can't handle me yourself? No. I just pinged 'em to prove you don't know the difference between slander and libel.
To: takenoprisoner
I am perplexed that you can't recognize him by my description. I could name about a dozen who would describe themselves that way.
To: RockinRight
Considering the fact that Rudy isn't a LIBERAL, I figured that you were just wrong about everything. ;^)
You should write more precisely, if you want to be understood and/or taken seriously.
To: onyx
Supporting the one party that actually defeats democrats is principled, but that fact is lost on you. Such conclusions are the product of your delusions and have nothing to do with anything I think, or have ever said.
156
posted on
02/15/2007 9:36:37 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
To: takenoprisoner
Who is the paragon of virtue, this grand exemplar of Conservatism? NAME HIM.
To: Corin Stormhands
LOL. I think you hit the proverbial nail on the head.
158
posted on
02/15/2007 9:38:02 PM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: hosepipe
Bill and Hillary had Newt for breakfast, lunch, and dinner and still have him on a leash. You are misguided if you really believe what you wrote in that post.
To: Corin Stormhands
160
posted on
02/15/2007 9:39:24 PM PST
by
onyx
(DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 201-214 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson