Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When is a contract worth more than half-a-billion dollars a public concern?
Evergreen Freedom Foundation ^ | 2-15-07

Posted on 02/15/2007 2:18:07 PM PST by truth49

Click Here to Listen to Audio

When is a contract worth more than half-a-billion dollars a public concern? When taxpayers have to fund it.

This is Ryan Bedford for the Evergreen Freedom Foundation.

On February 8, 2007, seven unions filed for an injunction to stop the state from releasing documents generated during the negotiations between the state and the public employee unions last year.

The most outstanding allegation in the unions’ compliant is, and I quote, “The information sought is of no legitimate concern to the public interest and is not in the public interest.”

This is ludicrous. The contracts will cost taxpayers more than a half-billion dollars. How can they not be of interest to the public? Few have a greater interest than legislators, who must vote to fund the contracts, and taxpayers, who actually pay the bill. Legislators and the public should have access to all the information they need to make well-informed decisions. They should not be asked to approve of, or fund a half-billion dollar bill negotiated behind closed doors.

The unions, however, argue that the release of the documents will chill member participation on union bargaining committees. They also claim the release of this public information will somehow interfere with their right to organize and represent workers.

This doomsday prophecy is way off the mark. The state’s collective bargaining system is protected by state statute. Honest state employees have no reason to fear for their jobs or careers when they participate in their union. The release of documents already in the state’s possession should be of no concern.

Unions must remember that the dollars that fund their contracts come from taxpayers’ pockets. In the private sector, secrecy may be appropriate, if only because owners, who must fund the contracts, sit at the bargaining table. In the public sector, however, unions are trying to lock the owner—in this case, the taxpayers—out of the room.

This is Ryan Bedford for the Evergreen Freedom Foundation.

To receive regular updates as they happen SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PODCAST using Itunes CLICK HERE (this includes our video podcast)

Click Here For More Information About Podcasts

If you have any questions feel free to contact our webmaster at cburres@effwa.org


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Washington
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/15/2007 2:18:09 PM PST by truth49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truth49

BTTT


2 posted on 02/15/2007 2:24:44 PM PST by Unicorn (Too many wimps around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49

Great news story... No mention whatsoever of what "state" we're talking about...


3 posted on 02/15/2007 2:29:45 PM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

Washington, the evergreen state. Although, when they came up with that nickname, I'm sure they never envisioned the socialist envirowhacko vermin pit it has become.


4 posted on 02/15/2007 2:34:29 PM PST by Valpal1 (Social vs fiscal conservtism? Sorry, I'm not voting my wallet over the broken bodies of the innocent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson