Replies

Not quite. I got to the point that I was willing to vote for him if he got the nomination and if he ran on the WoT and government reform. But he's been lying and weaseling in ways that would make a Clinton proud.
He claims he's a strict constructionist that would appoint judges like Scalia and Roberts - but his judge appointments in NYC don't reflect this.
He says the 2nd Amendment is about hunting and guns should be "regulated" according to the 2nd amendment. A "strict constructionist" would know that the 2nd Amendment ain't about hunting and that a "well regulated militia" means a well-equipped militia.
He says that he can't support banning partial birth infanticide unless there a provision for "life of the mother." That is weasely BS - PBA is never about the life of the mother.
And Guiliani, who made NYC into a "sanctuary city," said we need a "high-tech" (i.e. "virtual" meaning nonexistent) wall on the border.

He's a pro-abortion, pro-gun control, pro-pervert, pro-illegal. Some of his mayoral record (crime and government reform) is good; and maybe he'll fight the WoT (dunno how - he hasn't said much), but he isn't running on these items. He should be running as a Democrat. A liberal willing to fight the WoT and cut government bureaucracy and waste would be a welcome change from the ones running now.