Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: madprof98
I would select judges who try to interpret the Constitution rather than invent it...

I'm probably wrong, but I though judges tried cases, not intepreted the law. (A fine point, but important.)

4 posted on 02/14/2007 5:16:29 PM PST by rbookward (When 900 years old you are, type as well you will not!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rbookward
I'm probably wrong, but I though judges tried cases, not intepreted the law. (A fine point, but important.)

He is referring to appellate judges here, who don't do trials, but rather decide matters of law. Towards that end, they decide what the law says. So yes, judges interpret what the law means.

Judges also make law, which is what hundreds of years of common law is largely about.

8 posted on 02/14/2007 5:19:59 PM PST by HitmanLV ("I mean, that's a storybook, man!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson