Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: M. Dodge Thomas
The problem with this argument is that you then have to come up with a recent natural mechanism that's sequestering the CO2 we know human activity has produced in the last few hundred years. (We have good enough surrogates for CO2 production that we know it has to have been considerable, ...

Not considerable...

Sources of Greenhouse Gases

NOTE: "Human additions" represent such a small percentage of the total Greenhouse Effect (0.28%) that they are barely visible in this "pie chart" at the scale represented.


39 posted on 02/14/2007 1:11:34 PM PST by TigersEye (Ego chatters endlessly on. Mind speaks in great silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

What does water vapor have to do with whether or not human emissions of CO2 account for the recent considerable increase in atmospheric concentration?


42 posted on 02/14/2007 1:23:49 PM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson