Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ancient_geezer
Actually you use the transmission function...

Yeah, that's how I got it. If the absorption fractions are f1 and f2, the transmission fractions are 1-f1 and 1-f2 which you multiply and then apply the inverse map to turn it back into an absorption.

1 - (1-f1)(1-f2) = f1 + f2 - f1f2
The corollary is that there's actually no such thing as 100% absorption but you can get as near as you want.
125 posted on 02/16/2007 12:04:17 AM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: edsheppa

See it now, LOL.

I just look at how I implement it as a simulation on my spreadsheet. I tend to treat the problem as a series of layers or cells feeding light from one to the next in a chain.

Gives me a means to switch components in and out easily for simulating layers of atmosphere with differing characteristics and changing composition.


126 posted on 02/16/2007 12:55:00 AM PST by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson