Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tulsa Ramjet; Mr Ramsbotham; Alouette

Everyone…I agree this report is flawed, but dump the Iran, Congo, Mexico etc comparisons. The report only includes ‘industrialised’ actions.

Judging by the list here ‘industrialised’ apparently means Europe and the US:

(http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6359363.stm)

Don't ask me why they couldn't manage to get enough data from those economic backwaters (!) Japan and Australia.


22 posted on 02/14/2007 4:35:59 AM PST by FostersExport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FostersExport
I find their use of statistics meaningless and probably political. The study said that child poverty - defined as the percentage of children living in homes with incomes below 50 per cent of the national median

Really!! Due to the way in which peoples earnings change over time the only reason this number would not be ~50% is that most elderly with grown children do not have large incomes.

Don't ask me why they couldn't manage to get enough data from those economic backwaters (!) Japan and Australia.

Politically incorrect results maybe?

25 posted on 02/14/2007 4:47:55 AM PST by Fraxinus (My opinion worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson