Vanity: The tale of two parties

[Howlin]

I think you are tattling to Jim to remark you think don't fit on this forum.

Why not just ping him and ask him to remove everybody who doesn't agree with you?

[Howlin]

So if God gives us all free will and as a country "we" pick Rudy, you'll disagree with God.

Good to know where you're coming from.

[EternalVigilance]

You lack even a basic understanding of self-government, or the sovereignty of the people under God. No surprises there.

[onyx]

Oh yes, the pinging of Jim is an attempt to tattle. I see that often and Jim rarely replies...lol.

[Corin Stormhands]

I wonder how EV will take it when and if MILLIONS of people disagree with him.

You mean this time?

[onyx]

Just call her a liberal and a harpie and be done with it.

[EternalVigilance]

The arrogance of the Republican Party RINOs is breathtaking.

"Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine." - Rudy Giuliani

Pick a man who could utter the above about Bubba, and you'll deserve what you get. Too bad millions of good and decent people will have to suffer the consequences with you...

[Howlin]

You lack even a basic understanding of self-government, or the sovereignty of the people under God. No surprises there.

And after all that, I STILL can recognize you for what you are; it must just kill you that a dolt like me has your number.

You may ping Jim now.

[EternalVigilance]

What is your opinion of Giuliani's endorsement of Cuomo way back when?

Should such an endorsement inform the decision-making of Republican voters today?

[onyx]

I didn't like it at the time and still don't. I never endorse or vote for democrats.

[EternalVigilance]

Do you think it's a good plan for a party to nominate a candidate who holds almost all of the views of the opposition party and almost none of their own?

[Torie]

Not all Republicans agree with you on many issues. Now, just why is it "arrogant" to disagree with you? What did "RINO's" do to earn the sobriquet "arrogant?"

[Howlin]

Not all MANY Republicans agree with you on many issues."

There, that's MUCH better.

[EternalVigilance]

Well, it's obvious. They don't think they need pro-family, pro-life, pro-Constitution conservatives. What could possibly be more arrogant than that, since the above make up the majority of the coalition? It's not just arrogant, it's stupid. Of course, arrogance always does lead to stupidity...

[Howlin]

Now, just why is it "arrogant" to disagree with you?

Now, I know you already know the answer to that question..........LOL.

[onyx]

I don't think "the party" has any such plans, but I cannot predict who primary voters will choose. I will vote for Rudy is he's the GOP nominee.

[EternalVigilance]

I won't. The Reagan platform will have been abrogated.

[Torie]

Is it arrogant to think that you don't need Republicans that are Republicans because of economic, foreign policy and defense issues, but don't agree with you on many or most social issues? Or is this particular arrogance road a one way street?

[onyx]

The GOP platform will change if he's the nominee? I think not.

[EternalVigilance]

Is it arrogant to think that you don't need Republicans that are Republicans because of economic, foreign policy and defense issues, but don't agree with you on many or most social issues? Or is this particular arrogance road a one way street?

No. We need you. But you would bail if the nominee didn't represent anything you believed in, too. Probably. Unless you're like many here, and think that choosing our chief executive is like a football game.