Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Condor51
Dr. Dean had an A rating from the NRA as governor, so when the left got mad at him, he argued that Vermont didn't need gun control. Rudy's argument is that local municipalities should decide gun laws and you need more gun control in New York City than in Kansas! It is a conservative position to give power to local governments and out of the hands of the federal government which is what Giuliani is arguing for.

You are correct - that is truly a horrible lie. We now have seen federalism turned on its ear for Rudy - that it is "states rights" to ignore rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

That would only be valid if NYC seceded from the Union. Last I checked, it hadn't, so Rudy's (and this person's) logic is absurd.

90 posted on 02/13/2007 12:30:49 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

The right of the PEOPLE is not the same as the rights of any individual person. Certain persons can be forbidden guns without it interfering with the right of the PEOPLE.

Hence, it is entirely constitutional to restrict gun ownership to the sane, non-criminals, those who can see etc.


99 posted on 02/13/2007 12:34:46 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Defeat Hillary's V'assed Left Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson