Journalists are notoriously biased and subject to human error. They aren't infallible and shouldn't be above the law.
IMHO there are two ways to look at the issue of "bias". First, the journalist is unaware of their own bias and simply produces biased reports naturally. -OR- secondly the journalist uses the profession as a front to create ad copy (sow fear uncertainty and doubt) used to promote their political client (DNC).
If the the second scenario is true (which I happen to believe and observation supports), then the concept of "bias" is misleading in that it never addresses the real issue which is the MSM are not in anyway affiliated with objective journalism/news reporting but instead are a network of marketing firms, as unobjective as they can be for their client.
"bias" to me is a term perpetuated by the left which serves to A) frustrate conservatives (time and energy wasted) B) hide the true nature of their business model: Marketing Firm (with DNC as their single political client)
Pretty brilliant of them in an evil kind of way if you ask me.
Your Pal,
Eddie01