Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California's future may be paved with fees (Are Toll Roads The Future?)
LA Times ^ | 13 February 2007 | Evan Halper

Posted on 02/13/2007 5:42:17 AM PST by shrinkermd

SACRAMENTO — In California, birthplace of the freeway, where motorists can traverse all but a small fraction of the state without encountering a tollbooth, the free ride may be coming to an end.

There is emerging consensus in the Capitol that the state should follow the path already blazed elsewhere and look to tolls to help bankroll new roads, public and private.

Local and state transportation agencies are already planning several such projects on busy urban corridors, and some of the world's largest investment firms are lining up with proposals that could leave them in control of some major new roads.

Voters last November approved billions in borrowing for roads, but that was only a start; the money won't meet all the state's transportation needs and never was intended to. Nor would anything short of a major increase in the gas tax — one for which voters appear to have no appetite. That leaves tolls.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; US: California
KEYWORDS: freeway; future; tollroads
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: jim_trent
However, I don't know how to break this to you gently. Politicians lie.

I am aware of that.

I am NOT arguing that the gas tax actually covers the cost of the construction.

I am just doubting that they will REDUCE the tax.

21 posted on 02/13/2007 10:57:13 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: OregonRancher
Arroyo Seco Freeway (Pasadena) opened December 20, 1940. No tolls

I thought the initial phase of the Pennsylvania Turnpike opened around October of 1940.

Just bringing it up because my understanding was that “freeway” didn’t depend upon whether or not tolls were required, just whether it had controlled access and no crossings at grade.

Further, I recall there were highways (parkways, whatever) in the Northeast that *almost* qualified (technically) as freeways way before 1940. They had controlled access and no (or minimal) crossings at grade, but they prohibited commercial traffic and therefore couldn’t be called “freeways.”

But maybe I’m misremembering… there – there’s three minutes of my life gone that I’ll never get back. LOL.

I suspect it’s a case of California thinking they “birthed” something that they didn’t, that’s all.

22 posted on 02/14/2007 1:42:54 PM PST by Who dat?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Who dat?

My dad told me that the people were proud to call them freeways because they didn't have to pay a toll, we Californian's being so more advanced than the old fashioned people back east who didn't have the good sense to move someplace warm.

Said to me while Dad was driving.


23 posted on 02/14/2007 2:27:24 PM PST by OregonRancher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson