Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons; loboinok

I also have not seen where Rudy supports the Roe v Wade decision.


331 posted on 02/13/2007 1:28:41 PM PST by dervish (Rachel weeps for her children, she refuses to be consoled. Shalit, Goldwasser, Regev)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: dervish
I also have not seen where Rudy supports the Roe v Wade decision.

Giuliani's position on abortion has been posted on this thread and hundreds of times on this site, millions of times on the net. It is universally known.

In light of that, your suggestion that Giuliani does not support Roe v. Wade is the same,IMO, as saying Jefferson supported the 1st Amendment but opposed the Constitution.
335 posted on 02/13/2007 3:11:26 PM PST by loboinok (Gun control is hitting what you aim at!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]

To: dervish
Don't try to play word games; you'll lose.

Rudy is on record as saying that marriage is for a man and a woman. He has never said that he thinks that two men or two women should be allowed to marry.

He has also talked about Roe V Wade. He called is bad law and believes as most Conservatives do, that the decision belongs with the states.

345 posted on 02/13/2007 5:31:17 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson