(A) Terrorists
(B)Loss of Freedom by a Government
Guess you are forgeting that under Clinton and Reno local Law Enforcement Agencys were instructed by the feds to look for white people who had bibles, could quote the constitution and owned firearms.
So, which is the bigger threat?
(A) Foreign terrorists that have to enter our country to attack us or,
(B) A Government that can evaluate your threat level without a warrant? (especially since the criteria for your threat level are based on an ever-changing combination of legal activities which are cherry-picked by the whims of morons that don't understand the Constitution who also don't mind imposing their world-view of acceptable thought and activities on everyone around them)
What you and a number of other posters are forgetting is that Amdendments IV and V are there for a purpose, and it isn't to give safe harbor to the bogeyman but rather to give us safe harbor from the government.
Don't anyone even attempt to attack this assertion, as I was privy to the teletypes regarding these types of people as possible domestic terrorists - and they made for lively discussions amongst the white, christian, firearm-owning police officers.
Tough. I can't stand scumbags or lazy bums. There ain't no regulation and the nut bags are running crazy. I want some rules. The ISPs need to be held to some account. Right now they are a bunch of reckless idiots.